About a month after my report on Clean Energy, I came across this Guardian story: “Shell dumps wind, solar and hydro power in favour of biofuels”.
Have to admit it was disappointing to read it, since in my report it was clear that Shell was one of the few oil giants with a comprehensive renewable energy portfolio.
From a business perspective, it shouldn’t surprise that the oil giant has chosen to focus on biofuels since it complements their core business model and capabilities. However, if the richest energy companies in the world are themselves reluctant to fund investments and research into renewables, then the economic viability of such energy sources will be even further out of reach for humanity. Once again, it’s the chicken and egg question.
Shell, as a business, has to answer to its shareholders and justify whatever investments they make. So perhaps it’s left to investors to make their positions clear that they do not mind a slightly lower dividend at the moment, so it could translate into a much larger one when renewables take off in a big way and Shell becomes the market leader.
As it is, it appears that kind of investor’s foresight is lacking. And although focusing on biofuels is not “wrong” as it is a form of renewable energy, it is quite arguably the least efficient and most controversial of the renewable sources. Also, it does nothing to revolutionize the world’s transport system, save for finding another source to fuel combustion engine cars.
That there is a renaissance of the electric vehicle is extremely interesting in these times. Remains to be seen if the powerful energy lobby can once again kill it. But imagine the electric vehicle taking off in urban cities around the world, cars won’t even need biofuels then. What would companies like Shell do then?
Read full post...